Want to read more? Join my Patreon community

Porn discussion round-up

Posted at 23:25 on 1 Mar 2011 by Pandora / Blake

Tags: Gender politics, meta-analysis, Politics, Sex worker rights

Hello! I've had a brilliant few days away, including several kinky escapades which I will describe to you in due course. In the meantime, I have a growing collection of links I want to share with you in the wake of Lady Porn Day, so I thought I'd shove them all in a single post so I don't get overwhelmed by blog drafts.

1.
I really like this mini-comic Dirty Magazines by Heather Bradley about a young woman's first encounters with porn.





Obviously, I don't agree with the "no-one gets hurt" item in the narrator's definition of porn she's comfortable viewing, but I like the emphasis on the development of personal criteria. And you could more or less re-formulate it as "no-one gets harmed", using conventional BDSM distinctions between "hurt" and "harm".

2.
MayMay has written an excellent article unpacking the concept of "gaze" in porn, titled Breaking Pornography's Fourth Wall: Erotic Satisfaction as a Function of Gaze. Both article and comments are well worth reading.

Put simply, a gaze identifies a viewer, or a gazer. When a womans curves linger on-screen, as they so often do in cinema, or when a picture of, say, a skinny white womanbaring it all is shown, as it so often is in pornography, the viewer is commonlyand often rightlyassumed to be a heterosexual male.

However, this conceptualization of gaze is limiting. Knowing who the gazer is tells us very little about how they are gazing. Part of understanding a persons pornographic tastes relies on understanding whether their gaze is objectifying or embodying. An objectifying gaze is one in which the gazerthe consumer of the pornographic artifactimagines themselves as observing the model in a pornographic image, while an embodying gaze is one in which they imagine themselves as being the model. Read more »

3.
The Irrationality of the Anti-Sex Lobby by Brooke Magnanti on Freedom in a Puritan Age

The notion that exposure to sexualised imagery is a) different now than it has been in the past, and b) causes damage to children as a result, is widely assumed but not proven. Most of the reviews on the topic rely on data from adults viewing pornography, which is clearly not the same thing as children seeing a Bratz doll. In any case the results from adult studies are mixed, with a tendency to indicate that pornography may somewhat exacerbate, but does not itself cause, negative effects. The hype about sexualisation seems to assume a slippery slope that might not even have a fulcrum in the first place. Read more »

4.
Finally, here's a refreshingly balanced take on porn legislation on the Guardian's Comment is Free, by Kristina Lloyd - Why doesn't Jacqui Smith take a relaxed view of pornography?

And what might happen if people watched porn for hours on end? The implication is that this would be personally harmful and socially destabilising, a conclusion based in part on the notion that sexual pleasure is inherently corrupting. A great deal of lazy thinking, myth making, poor research and anecdotal evidence surrounds debates on the sex industry. A recent Cambridge debate asking "Does pornography provide a good public service?" saw prominent, anti-porn campaigner, Gail Dines, taken to task for supporting her argument with shoddy stats from unreliable sources. The Lilith report of 2003 used inaccurate statistics to conclude that an increase in lap-dancing clubs in Camden led to an increase in rape. The report, challenged by Brooke Magnanti, remains influential, presumably because to many people it sounds right. Read more »

Comments

Add your comment:

Post as:


(or log in to post with your own username)

(optional)

(optional)

Want to read more? Join my Patreon community
Become a Patron!

Browse archive

2011

Find Pandora online

Feminist porn

Spanking porn

Spanking blogs

Sex and Politics blogs

Toplists & directories