Archive for the ‘Gender politics’ Category

Midweek hyperkinks #6

I haven’t done a hyperkinks post in months – but don’t worry, I’m not going to attempt a complete catch up. Just a brief glimpse at some of the interesting and sexy things that have populated the internet in the last couple of weeks. Kink Feminist S&M Lessons from the Seduction Community by Clarisse Thorn. [...]

Kinky tea party

I found these pictures a while back courtesy of Male Submission Art, and thought they were worth sharing. They’re from a Flickr photoset called Kinky Tea Party, a concept gallery by Milo Ampersand that “juxtaposes everyday activities and BDSM scenes in order to comment on society’s discomfort/unease with sexuality, particularly kinky sex.”

The idea of people ignoring something that makes them uncomfortable bears a resemblance to the tendency to not look at someone who doesn’t fit in; who is ugly, or homeless, or has a disability. We don’t look, we walk past, we continue in our comfortable bubble. We surround ourselves with images of people who conform to an idea of acceptability, and everyone else is invisible. The fact that both the domme and the sub in this scene are transgender or genderqueer adds to the impact: in a real life kinky social situation, how comfortable would you be watching this couple play together?

With their elaborate costumes, make-up and drag the tea party guests aren’t quite “everyday”, but the idea of an intense flogging scene being played out amongst chattering guests, instructed to pay no attention to the players or the photographer, is a startling and powerful one.

The resulting imagery is surreal and often beautiful. The whole gallery is well worth a look.

Defining feminist porn

A little while ago I wrote an article in which I attempted to define what “fairtrade” porn would look like. There obviously isn’t an international standard for fairtrade porn, but perhaps there should be. Production ethics are something I’d love to see more producers publically talking about, especially the ones who are already doing things right.

As a feminist, I’m not only interested in ethical production in general, but also the specific ways in which porn can be compatible with feminist values. (My feminism is post-third wave sex positive trans/queer feminism, which holds no innate incompability with explicit sexual imagery and self-expression.) Not all producers are interested in being feminist, and that’s okay: I’m not saying that those studios are unethical. But if you do identify as a feminist, how does that affect the porn you make?

It’s not quite as simple as that feminist porn should be woman-positive, while fairtrade porn should be human-positive: it’s more that I think feminist porn takes extra care with gender expression, and strives to be explicitly gender egalitarian in its approach. Quizzical Mama has proposed some good guidelines, but they don’t leave space for low-budget/homegrown productions, nor for feminists who wish to explore their kinky, violent or nonconsensual fantasies in a progressive way.


Images via Sex is not the enemy

Although my own porn is kinky, I’ve tried to come up with a general set of principles which would apply to any kind of production. As always, I’m mostly interested in the realities of production, rather than the type of fantasy explored on screen. It’s informed by the good work already done by feminist pornographers: I’m not trying to re-invent the wheel here. My aim is to boost signal for good ideas, and extend the conversation.

Obviously any feminist pornographer has their own understanding, and I’m not trying to police anyone else’s feminism. This stab at a definition reflects my own process as a newbie pornographer: at this point in time, what does feminist porn mean to me?

Zoo real girls

A friend sneaked out this page from the Zoo magazine offices to show me. It’s a spread from the magazine, over which an editor has stapled tracing paper with scribbled instructions for ‘improving’ the images. It’s like an unholy mashup of the boss’ red pen with those reality TV shows in which plastic surgeons draw on women’s bodies, highlighting all the places they deviate from the ‘ideal’ unattainable without surgery or Photoshop.

The feature, called with brilliant irony ‘Zoo real girls’, shows off non-famous, conventionally pretty women who look a bit like conventionally pretty celebrities. Given the narrow range of physical appearance which conventional female prettiness describes – Caucasian, slender, youthful, fair, petite, delicate features, pert breasts, clear skin, etc – these ‘sexylikeys’ can’t be that hard to find.

This ‘real girl’ has classic glamour model looks, and is already made up, studio lit, flatteringly photographed and touched up by a previous photo editor. The red pen commentary ranges from the unnecessary but predictable (‘trim’, ‘flatten’, ‘curve’) to the downright creepy (‘reduce nipples’ – whut? What’s wrong with her nipples?). Other choice comments include ‘remove all beauty spots’ (real girls don’t have moles or freckles, you know), instructions to fix a ‘weird line’ caused by a previous editor’s nips and tucks (if you want it to look natural, you could, I don’t know, stop trying to artificially alter the shape of a human body?) and the super-flattering ‘tidy chicken skin’. Lovely!

Bet the resulting ‘tidied up’ images of herself make Ms Freimanis feel loads better about her appearance. Thank goodness lads’ mads feature real girls from time to time – I mean we wouldn’t want anyone to get unrealistic expectations about how our bodies should look.

Radical porn

Jimmy Holloway and Adele Haze at Dreams of SpankingI’ve just published a two part article on the Dreams of Spanking blog about making radical porn.

In part 1 I ask: is gender segregation in porn as intolerant as race segregation would be, and is it okay to discriminate on gender lines because it’s “not your kink”? To what extent can we hold individual producers responsible for being complicit in segregation and inequality in porn? How much social responsibility do porn producers have, anyway? I also question the tendency to defer to “market forces” as an excuse for maintaining an unfair status quo.

In part 2 I look at the duty website owners have to cater to the taste of their members, and the extent to which all businesses choose their audience. I also examine the tension between quality/originality and marketability/profitability and the assessment and balancing of risks which is inherent in all creative entrepreneurship, and the role economic and social privilege plays in this. Finally, I examine my own privilege in an unfair society – and why I’ve made the choices I have.

This article is the culmination of quite a lot of thinking on the social and economic issues involved in pushing the boundaries of porn production. I’d be very interested to hear what people have to say.

Radical porn I: complicity and the status quo

Radical porn II: privilege and balancing risks

Male spanking showcase

I’ve been experiencing a slightly strange phenomenon lately, while working fulltime getting Dreams of Spanking ready for launch. I’ve got used to seeing pictures of both men and women being spanked on a regular basis. It’s changed my perspective on most of the spanking sites and blogs I read. Suddenly, sites which only feature female spankees seem weirdly limited to me. It feels kind of unnatural and artificial to restrict appreciation of a shapely reddened bottom to only one sex.

Obviously, as a woman writing a blog about her personal experience of spanking, this site has always had a similarly skewed focus as well. And when I’m reading about a particular couple’s adventures it doesn’t seem as odd. I just wish that more of the sites aiming to give a broad look at spanking fantasies or spanking updates online included some scenarios in which boys get spanked too. To me, these days, it would feel much more normal.

Anyway, even though it’s hard to find the range I’m looking for within individual blogs, I’ve been able to provide some balance to my general viewing experience by adding sites focussing exclusively on boys getting spanked to my feed reader. The segregation seems a bit weird, but at least the end result is a pleasing mixture.

As a result, I’ve found loads of hot spanking photos of men. I didn’t even know how good some of the F/M and M/M sites were until I started looking, because they’re so rarely covered in the “mainstream” spanking roundups. So I wanted to share the goods for the benefit of other people who would quite like to look at cute male spankees, but don’t know where to find them. Still, I found myself hesitating. What if I alienated all my readers?

But then I thought, sod it, this is my blog and it’s about the spankings I find hot. So this post is for me, and for anyone else, boy or girl, who enjoys looking at quality spanking pictures and doesn’t really mind who’s getting it, as long as they’re spankable.

And some of these men are very spankable.


Fab poster art by Dave at Spanking4men. If you want a way into the world of spanked men, you could do a lot worse than starting with his Male spanking awards.


How irresistable is that bubble butt?


I saw this picture and my imagination instantly ran riot visualing the relationship I would have with this rugged spankee bear.

Not to mention this one:

HOT.


This doctor/patient scene by Sting Pictures looks rather good.


Pyjama-clad brat waiting for a bedtime spanking…


Mmm, I do love me a spanker in a suit.


Waiting in the woodshed


Ever wondered what happened if you pissed off Wonderwoman? Now you know.


Busted for dealing drugs? I’d take a spanking from Officer Chris over a prison term any day.


Who says boys don’t have curves?


More beautiful curves.


Scary spanker; pretty strapped bottom.


Mmmmmmmleather.


I really enjoyed the institutional paddling clip at the bottom of this post.


This one provided a certain amount of fantasy fodder too. (Do I have a thing for strong men being whacked with heavy wooden paddles? Maaaaaybe.)

Finally, I absolutely adored this real life discipline story by Audrey Knight, in which she tells us about spanking her boyfriend and brat, Stefan. Captures the emotional intimacy of a discipline dynamic so well, and I found it absolutely fascinating to read about the dominant perspective.

Submissive while feminist

I was very young when I first started practising kink. Young enough that I hadn’t really started to understand the nuances of consent, autonomy and privilege, and I hadn’t politically ‘awakened’ to the oppressive patterns that are propagated within our culture. I knew I wasn’t ‘normal’, that I was attracted to men and women, had kinky fantasies and was spectacularly bad at monogamy – but beyond that I hadn’t started thinking critically about gender, sexuality and relationships.

I got together with both my long term partners before I started calling myself a feminist. (My feminism, btw, is sex-positive queer and trans feminism: in a nutshell, aiming to radically redefine our understanding of gender in order to improve social conditions for people at all points on the gender spectrum, rejecting inequality based on gender or sexuality and promoting sexual freedom and acceptance.) I’ve changed a lot as I’ve educated myself about gender and culture, and my relationships have had to change with me.

So has my feminism affected my submission and my D/S relationships?

The ‘approved’ answer for a lot of people seems to be “no”. No, it hasn’t affected my submission: of course I can be a feminist and a female submissive. It’s my choice, my agency, my desires: what’s the problem?

I believe all these things to be true.

But since feminist theory became a structural part of my thinking and cultural analysis, it’s impossible to deny that yes, of course it has had an effect on my sexuality.

Mostly, that effect has been good. Sex positive feminism teaches us to reject patriarchal shame culture: neither male nor female sexuality is immoral, and it’s healthy and affirming for women to express and explore their sexualities without feeling shame or guilt. Feminism has taught me to be more articulate about my desires, to ask my partners for what I want in bed without feeling embarrassment or guilt. It’s taught me to practice safer sex, to negotiate boundaries and expectations clearly with new partners, to talk frankly and openly about sex with my lovers. (And this is to some extent about our feminism; my partners and I have all, collectively, got better as this over the last few years.) Both feminism and kink prioritise consent, negotiation and communication in sexual practice; there’s no contradiction there.

I fell into feminism late, at the age of 23. I don’t think it’s much of a coincidence that all my negative sexual experiences occured before this date, and all the positive ones after. [...]

I had submissive desires, but I didn’t express them because he was very “normal” and not very sexually motivated. I couldn’t imagine him having sexual kinks. I wanted to enjoy sex, and I encouraged it taking place, but it felt more like a duty. Pants off, do the deed, fake an orgasm, and about our merry way.

What changed, later in my life, is that eventually something snapped, and with the help of feminism and a considerable degree of choosiness regarding sexual partners, I learned to communicate my sexual desires frankly and honestly. My current sexual partners, and those I’ve had sex with on a more casual basis since discovering feminism, have been supportive of my submissiveness and made me feel safe in communicating those desires. I’ve felt far more empowered as a practicing submissive, having fantasies about being ordered and even forced almost everytime I’ve had partner sex, than I ever did in a more conventional sexual relationship.

Despite Ogi Ogas, Why Feminism and Submission Are Great Bedfellows

Feminism has also taught me to examine my sexuality, and identify areas where my desires might have been affected by patriarchal memes. It’s enabled me to start to dismantle the fatphobic misogyny and transphobia I was taught by the culture I was raised in. At 19 I tended not to sleep with fat women, trans or genderqueer people (fat men were less of a problem for me – go figure). At 27, I’ve realised it’s naive to think of that as “just personal taste” and have started to challenge received wisdom about what qualities are sexually desirable. As a result, I’ve had some fantastic sex (and indeed relationships) with beautiful people I would otherwise not have considered as potential lovers.

Feminism and gender theory have allowed me to look at male submission with new eyes, to challenge the gender inequality in kinky porn. They have taught me to love looking at men as much as women, and to identify with my male submissive brothers. They’ve inspired me to get over my hangups about subbing to women, which I had few models for as I grew up (to the extent that I wasn’t sure if I ever would), and they’ve helped me find the confidence to explore my switch side.

Feminism has also taught me to stand up for myself when I’m being bullied or silenced, and helped me reach a place where I am more grounded and secure in myself. It’s even helped me get over my eating disorder. These are all good things; they’ve made me stronger and more capable. And honestly, I think a strong, independent, responsible submissive has far more to offer than a broken, insecure one who is desperately dependent on their dominant.

It’s taken me many years of unlearning mainstream power dynamics to understand and accept my own desire for fictional, fetishized ones. Despite this deliberate journey of self-discovery and the accompanying (and perhaps contradictory) feelings of being in total control, it’s pretty evident that the feminist movement at large is not really ready to admit that women who like to be hit, choked, tied up and humiliated are empowered. Personally, the more I submitted sexually, the more I was able to be autonomous in my external life, the more I was able to achieve equality in my sexual and romantic partnerships, and the more genuine I felt as a human being. Regardless, I always felt that by claiming submissive status I was being highlighted as part of a social dynamic that sought to violate all women. [...]

The safe, sane, and consensual BDSM landscape is made up of stringent rules and safe practices designed to protect the feelings of everyone involved and to ensure constant, enthusiastic consent. The culture could not exist if this were not the case; a submissive participates in power exchange because a safe psychological space is offered up to do so. That space creates an opportunity for a display of endurance, a relief from responsibility, and feelings of affection and security. Before any “scene” begins, the rules are made clear and the limitations agreed upon.

Finding a partner or dom to play with is the ultimate achievement in trust, and giving someone the power to hurt you for pleasure is both liberating and powerful. The more I embrace submissive sexuality, the more I come to learn that, despite all appearances to the contrary, consensual, respectful SM relationships generally dismantle the very tropes that rape culture is founded on.

The Fantasy of Acceptable ‘Non-Consent’: Why the Female Sexual Submissive Scares Us (and Why She Shouldn’t)

But my feminist learning has, undeniably, triggered hiccups in my submissiveness too. The submission I knew as an unreconstructed teenager is no longer applicable. Then, I would have submitted uncomplainingly to a sexual relationship which always prioritised my dom’s pleasure or orgasm over my own. These days, I’m less inclined to see that as an okay or healthy pattern, even within a D/S context. Then, I loved doing housework for my dom and was perfectly happy for this to be a one-way transaction. Now, I’m unwilling to use housework as a D/S exchange unless my partner’s contribution to the household chores are fair in general. In other words, I’m unwilling to let D/S become an excuse for us to replicate patterns of gendered behaviour that continue to oppress women.

That last example is revealing. As a feminist, it’s not that I’m unwilling to engage in consensual domestic service: only that I’m motivated to ensure that I only do so within a healthy, functional and balanced domestic relationship. In other words, feminism has helped me define the parameters of my submission and establish its boundaries.

That’s no bad thing. I’ve got over the idea which I had when I was younger that being more submissive in a D/S exchange somehow equated to being “better” in a moral sense. When I was 19 I looked at 24/7 relationships and wondered if they represented something I should aspire to. Now, I know I am a fiercely independent, proud individual who thrives on self-sufficiency. At the moment I’m mostly living on D’s generosity, and while I hugely appreciate his support, in a way it’s also driving me nuts. I’m someone who needs, financially, to stand on her own two feet; who needs independent means with which she can be generous to her loved ones, rather than depending on the generosity of others.

As a feminist adult, I’ve come to terms with the realisation that I’m not 100% submissive – and accepted that that’s nothing to feel guilty about. When I started on my kinky journey I didn’t know how submissive I would turn out to be. At 27, I have a clearer idea.

  • I’m not submissive with everyone. On the contrary, I only give my primary romantic partners that gift.
  • Within those relationships, I’m not always submissive. When it comes to my finances, my work, my art, my schedule, my friendships, my sexual affairs with other people, how I spend my time, I’m naturally very dominant. I juggle several professional roles with various creative and political projects, and within that, I thrive on pushing myself hard and making my own decisions. What’s more, this dominance over certain areas of my life doesn’t devalue my submission in other areas.
  • My dom can’t tell me that I need to work harder. But they can tell me that I need to look after myself better; that I need to take time off or relax more.
  • I can’t hear any comment or criticism of my eating patterns. As a recoverer from an eating disorder, that’s entirely my own business. But (once I’ve stated an intention to do so in general) I can be prompted to go to the gym, and I can be told I need to have some juice rather than another glass of wine. Our D/S dynamic undercuts my pride and makes it easier to accept good advice.
  • I won’t believe I’m behaving badly on their say so, just because I’m their sub. But if they can reasonably persuade me that I’ve been in the wrong, I can accept (and will sometimes even ask for) corporal punishment as a way to resolve my remorse and guilt.
  • If I’m stressed and struggling to make a decision, and actually any of the options I’m considering would do, I’ll sometimes ask my dom to make it for me simply to save on faff. I value their opinions highly and will tend to take their advice, especially on personal or social matters, or in areas where they have greater expertise. (But that’s not really submission in a power exchange sense, is it? That’s just not being an arrogant dick.)

It probably goes without saying that the place I am most submissive is the bedroom. So has my feminism affected that?

The principles of sexual agency, communication, confidence and self-love that I have learned from feminism have a complicated relationship with my kink. Sexual agency for a sexual submissive and masochist are not straightforward. I want my pleasures to be tended, yes: I want orgasms, I want to be spanked, I want to be beaten. These are all direct wants which it’s possible for me to ask for, and feminism has taught me that it’s okay to ask for what I want in bed. The sex I’m having has improved as a result.

But, sexually, I also have other, more subtle wants. Sometimes, when I’m with my doms, I want my wants to be ignored. I want to be used without reference to my pleasure. I want to play non-consent scenes. I want to surrender to my dom’s will, trust them to push me through my fear and uncertainty, and be carried by them on a journey that leaves me sated and reeling. I want to experience the joys and thrills of relinquishing control and responsibility.

My doms are respectful, socially conscientious men and feminist allies. They are willing to listen to me. If I say I want to be beaten with such-and-such an implement, I’m expressing my masochistic desires and sexual agency as a bottom, but am I submitting?

Asking to be dominated, rather than simply topped, is a much bigger, more complex beast. It requires a great deal more trust and puts my dom in a far greater position of responsibility. I am, in effect, gifting my sexual agency to my dom for the duration of an individual scene.

If our D/S dynamic ever steps beyond the bedroom, I am gifting not just my sexual agency, but (an aspect of) my agency itself. That gift is not absolute – I’m not a slave and never will be – and is defined by carefully negotiated boundaries, but it involves giving up power nonetheless.

Making that gift is not inherently unfeminist. We give up or delegate power all the time – to employers, clients and political representatives. Giving it to a trusted partner is arguably a safer bet. Feminism has taught me to value, recognise and act on my agency and responsibility, and that validation has, I think, increased the value of the gift. Giving submission as a feminist is a different, more conscious act, involving a subtler understanding of the interaction between my short-term and long-term desires, and requiring, if anything, even greater trust in and respect for my dom.

My submission has needed to be re-built within the empowered, reconstructed self that has emerged as I’ve grown up. What that means in practice is that I need to have a very clear idea of what I want and what I’m asking for; and be willing to take responsibility for my reactions if I get it. It also means that I can take responsibility for the decision to accept an experience I don’t particularly want right now as a gesture of submission to my dom’s will. Submission is not my default: every time I choose to submit, that is a deliberate and conscious act of will.

Acts of submission are often harder for me to give, these days, and they’re rarer than they were eight years ago: but that makes them more precious. Now that I have more self-worth, more independence, more strength of mind, I need to give that much more if I want to experience the joys of submission. I think that overall, the difficult submission of a feminist adult is healthier, more meaningful and more rewarding than it was when it was easy.

Weekend hyperkinks #5

Since I started doing these hyperkinks posts – weekend roundups of the interesting links that I’ve recently posted on Twitter, for the benefit of those who don’t use the site, or at least aren’t permanently glued to their feeds – it’s been cool to see the fluctuations in the sort of thing I repost. Some weeks it’s all sex positive feminism, sex worker rights, female gaze porn. Other weeks it’s all writing about kink.

This edition of Hyperkinks is, apparently all about the porn. Specifically, it’s mostly about caning. I’m struggling to fit it into my usual “kink, porn and politics” categories – but I trust that won’t put you off.

This first section defies categorisation – a mishmash of female gaze, relationships, sex and gender politics.

  • Men of the Stacks: a nudie calendar “representing the professional and personal interests of male librarians”.
  • Lucy McLean linked me at this surprising, but awesome link to nylon tights designed especially for men by Hosiery legend GERBE – a step forward for cross-dressers, genderbenders and fashion conscious chaps.
  • Mistress Matisse asks whether straight men who try to be sex objects are ridiculous – a thought-provoking analysis of how both men and women perpetuate this particular piece of sexism.
  • In the UK? Don’t miss the Sex Workers Open University, Oct 12-16, with workshops, performances, and community, urges Kitty Stryker.
  • May May has a draft article on polyamory and social networks which is worth a read. “The most obvious limitation with the often-monogamous notion of “true love” is that it creates a scarcity model.”
  • I was amused both by the name of the The Asylum Street Spankers and their song Stick Magnetic Ribbons on Your SUV. Who said kink and politics don’t mix?
  • This one is definitely porn rather than politics, but it’s not spanking either, so here it goes. The trailer for Elegance Studios’ new horror bondage flick Haunted looks beautiful, incredibly well made, and makes me wish damsels-in-distress was more my kink.
  • Every kinkster or chronic pain sufferer should go and look at Hyperbole and a Half’s awesome and hilarious CHART OF PAIN.

Spanking non-fiction

  • I love Rayne’s Countdown Caning concept in this post. Rising fear, speed and adrenaline! Definitely one to try.
  • Ten Amorette problematises the idea of “vanilla” in her excellent post What’s your flavor?
  • Minx Girls’ “how to” guide to spanking is well worth a read – I’d recommend it as a link to give to newbie spankers – with a focus on warm ups and implements.
  • Moving writing on self-pleasure and sexual power by new kink blogger Motley Wanderer: Healing with Masturbation. “In submission I give power to a Dom (real or imaginary!), but I then receive my own sexual power back tenfold.”
  • Intense, scary yet affirming report of a cold school caning scene by Kami Robertson.

Spanking fiction

  • A Barn Burner is a first attempt at M/M spanking fiction from a straight male writer. This one is close to my heart, as it was my own writing about the invisibility of M/M as a genre that inspired him to try his hand. It’s also an emotion-laden Vietnam war era father/son domestic discipline scene centred around a heart-thumpingly severe strapping. All good with me.
  • A squirmy hot dormitory/cellblock punishment image from Lupus Spanking. The position looks horrible, horrible; but I love the implication that the row of beds (and inmates awaiting punishment) is endless, extending to either side of the frame for miles and miles…
  • Buffy the Vampire Slayer getting a searingly hard hairbrush spanking from a furious Faith: one sizzling panel in the ongoing comic Slayer’s Revenge.
  • In need of some sexual relief the other day, I turned to this free judicial punishment clip from the Spanking Court. I know from reading Erika Scott’s report of shooting with them that these guys treat their performers well, which makes the severity of the scenes all the more appealing.
  • Actually I don’t know if this photo counts as fiction or non-fiction, so take your best guess. Either way, what stands out for me is the relaxed smile on her face as the cane’s about to fall…

Pretty cane marks
(Yep. An entire section devoted to pretty cane marks. What?)

  • Pretty purple welts from Dallas Spanks Hard
  • Nimue Allen shows off vivid lines immediately after a judicial punishment: 24 strokes of the cane, hard, from cold
  • Whippy red stingers from GBS
  • And finally, the aesthetically appealing bruises I sported the day after earning my Caning Merit Badge:

Weekend hyperkinks #4

I’m coming to the end of a deliciously decadent weekend with D and two very good friends. I had a lovely time at Torture Garden last night, which seemed to have a more relaxed and friendly atmosphere than at previous events, as well as no shortage of pretty people to look at. We got looked at ourselves at various points during the evening, and the debauchery continued once we were back at D’s. I’m curled up on his sofa now under a duvet, happy and sleepy.

Things have been exciting for me since my last hyperkinks – two thrilling shoots for my site (the last ones before I launch!), my growing confidence as a switch with the aid of the ever-willing Jacq, and various good times in my personal life. But there’s been exciting stuff happening in the wider internetty world as well:

Kink

  • I liked this post on the “Seven matrices of submission” by Rabbit White – an interesting deconstruction of varying types or aspects of submission, including ownership, service, restraint, being degraded, being fucked, being given away. Unsurprisingly, I particularly enjoyed the section on being beaten:

    Do you want or need to be beaten? This is not always about pain. You can “beat” someone for long periods of time without hurting them. When you are beaten you are the center of someone’s physical attention. This is about having someone use their strength against you… its not the pain but being the focus of a partner’s aggression. And of course, some people do like pain.

  • BDSM’s Dirty Secret – The Real Risk of Kinky Sex emphasises the emotional intimacy of pain and power play:

    SM, along with some sports, is one of the few remaining semi-sanctioned arenas where raw emotions and connections are permitted and even celebrated. To engage in this behavior may lead to a flood of emotions, elation and even risk a failure to achieve connection, with the added danger of feeling genuine loneliness. It takes guts, skill and personal risk to fly high with another person.

  • The Guardian had an interesting article a couple of weeks back on whether BDSM lifestyle should be protected in UK law as a philosophical belief, hinging on a worker dismissed for wearing her collar to work, and comparing the BDSM lifestyle with other cultural and religious practices. Kitty Stryker offers a counterpoint in her post “public kink != LGBT rights” on the question of whether individuals have the “right” to express their kink in public spaces.
  • BDSM & Rape – what now? – a great round-up by Charlie Glickman, looking at how to reduce/prevent sexual assault within the BDSM community.

Sex work

  • If you ever find yourself in an argument on sex work and feminism, this essay might come in handy – an excellent answer to the question is sex work anti-feminist? (TLDR; no.)
  • While I was in Germany, controversy on sex work and motherhood abounded as Furry Girl aggressively challenged Madison Young on her use of images featuring her newborn. I briefly engaged with the debate on twitter as it first unfolded, but it’s been covered in far more detail since. Brief roundup: Maggie Mayhem explains eloquently why “paedophile” is not an accusation to be made lightly; Furry Girl‘s statement defending her stance; media write-up by Salon magazine and finally, Madison’s artist statement for the work in question.
  • Broadly, I’m with Madison on this one – I don’t think being a sex worker makes every creative expression in your whole life sexual or pornographic by default; I think parents and guardians have the right to consent to childrens’ appearance in art, even political art; I don’t think there’s anything intrinsically wrong with having sex or sexual conversations near, around or in the same room as very young children (although Madison’s ‘crime’ was merely including her child in an educational event about sexuality), and I think it’s highly offensive to suggest that this is in any way comparable to paedophilia. All of this has inevitably triggered thoughts and conversations on sex, sex work and parenting, and some of those thoughts are expressed in my comment on Kitty Stryker’s “To breed or not to breed” post here.

Science!

Female gaze

  • I loved this retro-style pinup set of men wearing and doing stereotypically masculine things – but posing in the style of classic cheesecake. It’s like a cross between cheesecake and beefcake. Mmm, cake.
  • Blue by clickandclash, on Flickr

  • Another interesting female gaze link for you: a website devoted to selling fancy bedroom wear for men to wear to please their lady friends, full of photos of ultra-buff masculine models flaunting lacy and silky underthings. It’s cross-dressing, but it’s not feminising; a fascinating double ground to try and inhabit. I particularly enjoyed the “Fantasy” section, although I admit I was disappointed that the “Iron Man corset” didn’t feature look like actual Iron Man armour.

    But – sculpted latex superhero corsetry for men, though! If it existed, that would actually be awesome.

Whatever you do, don’t click here.

Weekend hyperkinks #3

Every time I think back on Thursday night I can’t help grinning. I feel like I did after my first well-paid glamour shoot; like a successful shoplifter. There’s a tremendous sense of self-sufficiency, and the giggling, incredulous thrill of having done something outrageous and got away with it. (Although I haven’t quite got away scot-free – aside from the hangover and a bruise on Jacq’s right cheek, my quads have been bloody painful the last two days, and I have no idea why. Can you strain them just by kneeling up on the bed for extended periods of time?)

But enough about me. On to this week’s hyperkinks!

  • My name is me: a new website bringing together people from all walks of life to challenge Google+ and Facebook’s restrictive and damaging policy disallowing pseudonyms. Violet Blue’s statement in particular is a must-read.
  • Maggie Mayhem and Kitty Stryker have put together a new website on ways members of the BDSM community can work together to prevent abuse: www.consentculture.com. Here’s an interview with them about the project, and here’s Kitty’s call for people to contribute their stories.
  • Jane of Janes Guide has written two great articles recently on this topic: BDSM, negotiation and consent, and More on BDSM and abuse. Raw, personal and thought-provoking – worth a read.
  • Lab Coats and Lingerie has a hard-hitting take on the problems with our restrictive model of what it means to be a female top in One of the nineteen. “I had no image of dominance other than the PVC-encased dominatrix, which–while fun to look at–sure isn’t anything like me. Not matching the classic femdom image didn’t just make me not a dominant … I actually believed I was not kinky.”
  • Now for some eye candy! I love this Victorian schoolgirl birching photo.
  • Elegance Studios have a trailer up for their forthcoming bondage feature film, Slave Auction
  • There’s a tremendously engaging sense of fun in this bedroom bondage photo – looking at it I feel like I’m right there with them.
  • Maggie Mayhem and her partner Ned have teamed up to launch an exciting new homegrown porn site, Meet the Mayhems. It combines sex education, informative articles, hot photos and steamy, satirical sex scenes between two people who are really into each other. At $8/month with no strict update schedule and pay-per-download options, it also represents an interesting new take on the traditional paysite model.
  • Next weekend I’m giving a talk at BDSMtag, a kink advocacy and outreach conference in Cologne. One of the organisers is Direktor Sands of SM Circus fame, and he suggested I travel over for the weekend, shoot on the Friday and attend the conference on the Saturday. They proposed an interview format for the talk, which is on BDSM and politics in the UK, so Ludwig has volunteered to help out by asking the questions. Should be fun!
  • Is Spanked, Not Silenced one of your favourite blogs? If so, please visit Between My Sheets and nominate my blog for the 2011 Sexiest Bloggers awards. There’s some great political and sex positive blogs already on the list, and a few kinky blogs, but there aren’t many candidates yet that are both political and kinky. I’d really appreciate the chance to give the topics I write about a wider reach. It’d make me very happy if one of you took the time to make a nomination :)
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...
 
SpankSwap - spanking site banner exchange
Powered by WordPress