Archive for the ‘Kink activism’ Category

Midweek hyperkinks #6

I haven’t done a hyperkinks post in months – but don’t worry, I’m not going to attempt a complete catch up. Just a brief glimpse at some of the interesting and sexy things that have populated the internet in the last couple of weeks. Kink Feminist S&M Lessons from the Seduction Community by Clarisse Thorn. [...]

Consent and negotiation

Consent is complicated, and playing with non-consent can be really difficult to do in a way that feels reassuring and secure for all concerned. This short film, found via Kitty Stryker, offers an awesome introduction to the complexities of non-consent play:

The “obvious answer” to the problem posed by this film is to use a safeword, but safewords can also be pretty complex. There’s a lot to say about safewords, but right now I want to focus on the negotiation part of non-consent play.

Kinky tea party

I found these pictures a while back courtesy of Male Submission Art, and thought they were worth sharing. They’re from a Flickr photoset called Kinky Tea Party, a concept gallery by Milo Ampersand that “juxtaposes everyday activities and BDSM scenes in order to comment on society’s discomfort/unease with sexuality, particularly kinky sex.”

The idea of people ignoring something that makes them uncomfortable bears a resemblance to the tendency to not look at someone who doesn’t fit in; who is ugly, or homeless, or has a disability. We don’t look, we walk past, we continue in our comfortable bubble. We surround ourselves with images of people who conform to an idea of acceptability, and everyone else is invisible. The fact that both the domme and the sub in this scene are transgender or genderqueer adds to the impact: in a real life kinky social situation, how comfortable would you be watching this couple play together?

With their elaborate costumes, make-up and drag the tea party guests aren’t quite “everyday”, but the idea of an intense flogging scene being played out amongst chattering guests, instructed to pay no attention to the players or the photographer, is a startling and powerful one.

The resulting imagery is surreal and often beautiful. The whole gallery is well worth a look.

A beginner’s guide to spanking

First published in FortheGirls.com erotic e-zine for women.

I was eight when I finally summoned up the courage to confide in my best friend. We’d shared all our secrets except one thing, and it felt like it had haunted me forever. Once I’d decided to do it, my heart wouldn’t stop pounding. I leaned over the lunch table and whispered, “I want to be spanked.”

She didn’t reply. I assumed she hadn’t heard, and I couldn’t bring myself to say the words again. It was years until I was able to talk freely about the desires I’d had since I was a little girl.

These days, I know I’m not alone. Lots of people are excited by the idea or practice of erotic spanking. It’s not a new phenomenon, either – the Kama Sutra contains an entire chapter on pleasurable ways to strike your lover.

Sarah Gregory Spanking

What exactly is spanking?

Spanking refers to the act of slapping or smacking someone on the bottom. Some people like to be smacked on other parts of the body – such as thighs, breasts, hands and feet – and this tends to be subsumed into the category of ‘spanking’ too. It’s also sometimes referred to as “impact play” or “corporal punishment”, and is often grouped under the umbrella category of BDSM – although liking spanking doesn’t necessarily mean you’ll enjoy any of the other kinks associated with BDSM.

A 2007 American study reported that 14 percent of men and 11 percent of women have had “personal experience with sadomasochism”, and even more have fantasised about it. The Brits have a little more data: an online sex survey of 850 UK adults in 2001 found 16 percent of women and 13 percent of men enjoyed bedroom spanks, and psychotherapist Brett Kahr’s 2007 book “Sex and the Psyche” found 7 to 30 percent of British adults fantasise about spanking in one form or another.

Here’s what spanking isn’t: it’s not unhealthy, it’s not linked to past abuse or trauma, and doesn’t mean you’re mentally unwell. The therapeutic effects of spanking play with a trusted partner can be useful in seeking emotional release after a distressing experience, and some people have successfully used violent sex as a form of self-therapy to work through trauma, but for most people there is no connection. If it makes you and your partner feel good, you probably don’t have anything to worry about.

If I like spanking, am I abnormal?

People have tried to categorise “normal” sexual behaviour for years, but there is no such thing as “normal” or “abnormal” when it comes to the colourful spectrum of human sexuality. Sex educator Charlie Glickmann puts it more bluntly – in his book, “nobody gets to be normal”. Whether spanking adds occasional spice to your sex life, is something you only fantasise about, or is a core part of your sexuality, you are no more normal or abnormal than anyone else.

Some people (like me) start fantasising very young; even before puberty. For years I thought I was a freak, but as an adult I’ve encountered countless other people who had the same experience. Others discover their desires later in life, perhaps through reading, or a partner who’s into it.

Sexuality is fluid, and varies over time and depending on circumstance. Tastes can change, and desires will ebb and flow. It’s okay to try new things – don’t dismiss your fantasies as a “phase” to be ignored. We can’t help what turns us on. Whatever that may be, the healthiest thing to do is acknowledge it and accept it.

So what does this involve?

An interest in spanking can take all sorts of forms. If your lover has approached you about trying spanking, don’t leap to conclusions about what this involves – there’s a whole range of things to try. Roleplay, dressing up (everything from schoolgirl to courtesan), pretend punishment, punishment for things you’ve really done, affectionate and erotic spanking – the possibilities are limited only by your imagination.

Wanting to be spanked doesn’t mean you have to be submissive in bed, and wanting to spank someone doesn’t mean you have to be dominant (although they often go together). Some people never feel submissive but still like to be spanked from time to time – much as they might ask their lover to perform any other erotic service.

The person doing the spanking can be referred to as the “spanker” or “top”, and the person getting spanked the “spankee” or “bottom”. The same person can be both at different times; many people enjoy both angles. There are couples that play both ways, and others who have a single direction that works best for them.

Spanking overlaps with “power exchange”, where one lover puts themselves in the other’s power. It’s called power exchange because it doesn’t mean the submissive lover is powerless – they’re just giving their partner permission to exercise power over them for a period of time. It’s a great gesture of trust, and it makes both of you very vulnerable; not just the bottom, but also the top, who is probably worried about getting it right. This exchange of trust and vulnerability can be profoundly intimate.

The key in bringing any fantasy to life is enthusiastic consent. If your fantasies involve pretending that you don’t want something, that consent has to be made explicit beforehand. Negotiation and communication are both crucial. Talk to each other: what do you like? What are you scared of? How do these ideas make you feel?

It can be helpful to check in with each other during play, too. The top could ask the bottom questions to get feedback on what works for them. Don’t be afraid to take time out to cuddle and talk about your reactions.

A lot of people who like spanking don’t actually enjoy the sensations at the time (after all, it can hurt!), but still find the whole experience very erotic. Nervous anticipation before a spanking can be highly arousing. Fear triggers adrenaline, and the brain produces endorphins in response to physical pain. Not only can a spanking get easier as the bottom relaxes and “warms up”, but afterwards they’ll feel a pleasant glow and natural high that can last for hours.

Reactions to a spanking vary. You might end up feeling floaty, relaxed, sociable, euphoric or horny. You might release some tension that you’ve been holding on to, have a cry and feel better for it. Like physical exercise, spanking can ground you in your body. Some people find it helps them process difficult emotions. If you’ve played hard or tested your boundaries, it can leave you feeling exhilirated, with an increased self-confidence, and awareness of your own strength and courage.

Some people sit on their desires for years or even decades, but receive a positive response when they finally open up. The fact that something is important to your partner (and, even better, makes them desperately horny) can be enough to spark an interest. Neither of you should do anything that makes you feel truly uncomfortable, but don’t let shyness or social conditioning stop you from trying something new.

How to get started

  1. Read blogs. There are loads of great blogs about spanking, most of them written by women. My Bottom Smarts has lots of information for newcomers and links to other blogs that are worth exploring. You can read about other people’s experiences, ask questions, get ideas and reassurance. I know several people who first confided their spanking fantasies anonymously on some spanking blog or other – and ended up meeting play partners and friends for life. Besides, sending your lover a link to a blog post can be an easy way of telling them what you like…
  2. Watch porn. There’s a lot out there, but again, blogs can be a good place to start. If you’re concerned about the consent aspect of spanking videos, a lot of performers have blogs which might help reassure you. SpankingTube is free, and includes sample clips from a lot of sites, as well as amateur clips produced by couples at home.
  3. Show your lover some erotic writing, pictures or video you like, and see what they think. Ask them about their fantasies – you might find ideas that work for both of you.
  4. If your partner isn’t sure at first, try not to pressure them by mentioning it repeatedly. However, a flirty text or email telling them what you want them to do to you never goes amiss. Emphasise how turned on it would make you. Few people can resist the desire to indulge their lover – and your enjoyment might be contagious!

Reluctant Young Men

Taking the plunge

So, heart in mouth, you’ve confessed your fantasies – or listened understandingly while your lover confessed theirs. Well done you! But how to bring those fantasies to life?

Firstly, don’t be put off if you feel a bit foolish. Let’s be honest – spanking can be hot, but it’s also somewhat silly. Recognising that silliness doesn’t have to be a show-stopper – it’s called “play” for a reason! Getting the giggles is fairly common; in fact laughter is a key part of a lot of spanking roleplay, and cheeky banter can be as much fun as the spanking itself.

There’s no need to rush out and spend loads of money. Contact between hand and bare bottom can be the most intimate of all.

Start out with some kisses and cuddles. Massaging and rubbing the bottom feels great, and can make the spankee hungry for more. The round lower half of the bottom is an erogenous zone, and spanking can stimulate blood flow to the whole region and increase sensitivity in the scrotum or vulva. Begin gently, with lots of reassuring strokes and rubs. Alternating harder spanks with light caresses can keep the spankee guessing and all their nerve endings tingling.

Admiring comments about the lovely appearance of the spankee’s posterior might help them feel relaxed and confident. If you’re the spankee, give your lover lots of positive feedback and show them how horny it makes you.

Either way, don’t be shy about expressing how you’re feeling, or asking questions. It can be hard for the spanker to tell what effect they’re having. One idea is to set a scale of 1-5, where 1 is “not hard enough”, 3 is “just right” and 5 is “much too hard”. Check in with each other frequently.

Positions and practicalities

The spankee lying over the spanker’s knee is traditional, and allows for lots of intimacy and physical contact. It can also make the spankee feel pleasantly small and vulnerable.

Another favourite is for the spankee to lie facedown on the bed with some pillows or a bolster under their hips. Some people find the sensation of having their bottom lifted highly erotic – and it presents an appealing target.

Be careful about hitting too high or too low. Don’t hit someone’s genitals unless they’ve explicitly said that’s what they want. It can also be dangerous to hit the lower back where the kidneys are, especially if you’re using an implement. And the backs of the thighs are extremely sensitive – some people like this, but ask before you smack.

Spanking someone with your hand for the first time can be hard work – and surprisingly painful for spanker as well as the spankee! It gets easier with practice, but in the meantime, if you’re having so much fun you want to step it up a notch, you can work wonders with household items like a smooth-backed hairbrush, a ruler or a wooden spoon. Many people love the warm, sensual feeling of being spanked with leather, but I’d advise aspiring spankers to practice on a cushion before they use a belt on their lover, as they can be difficult to aim. You can buy leather paddles on the high street, in the same sort of price range as a vibrator.

Sounding good? Whether you like giving or receiving, spanking can be a vibrant part of a healthy sexuality. If you start to explore your kinky desires you’ll end up thinking in new ways about your preferences and boundaries. For many people this results in an enhanced understanding of their own desires, better communication with their partner, and an increased awareness of consent. Even if it turns out that spanking isn’t for you, these are good things to think about. But you’ll never know until you try.

Crash Pad Series

A victory for sexual freedom

For the past few days I’ve been watching the development of #ObscenityTrial, a landmark case in which Michael Peacock (AKA Sleazy Michael) was tried for distributing “obscene” DVDs showing gay fisting, watersports, CP and BDSM. Today the jury returned a unanimous verdict of not guilty on all counts. It’s been a fascinating case, particularly the live tweets from the courtroom by @ObscenityLawyer, @LexingtonDymock and @NichiHodgson.

Plus there’s been all those opportunities for fisting puns. I mean, without first hand experience of the acts depicted it was all quite a lot to take in, so we should give the jury a hand for knuckling down and returning a sensible judgement.

If you’ve not been following, here’s a quick roundup to bring you up to date.

Why opt-in filters for “adult content” are misguided and dangerous

Last week, the government unveiled a deal with four of the UK’s biggest internet service providers – BT, Sky, TalkTalk and Virgin, collectively comprising about 90% of the market – which will oblige new subscribers to “opt in” if they want to view web content which has been categorised as sexually explicit.

I wrote about this in December last year when the Tory proposals were first publicised. This is part of a large-scale campaign against the so-called “sexualisation of children” which include such regressive proposals as Nadine Dorries’ sexist plans for abstinence-based sexual education for teenage girls, and which collectively poses a significant threat to fans of sexual freedom, civil liberties and digital rights.

In June this year the government-commissioned Bailey Report was published by the Chief Executive of the Mother’s Union, a Christian charity, in conjunction with the Department of Education. Dr Brooke Magnanti wrote an excellent critique of the dodgy evidence used to substantiate the anti-porn agenda back in May, which also revealed the extent to which the whole programme has been fueled by the American Christian far-right:

Looking deeper, the ‘research’ turns out to be The Social Costs of Pornography: A Collection of Papers. It includes contributions from such notables as Patrick Fagan from the Family Research Council, a far-right American lobbying organisation. Fagan also works with the Heritage Foundation, once considered the architects of the Reagan administration’s covert Cold War operations, and active supporters of George W Bush’s international policy. Fagan’s other recent papers include “Virgins Make the Best Valentines” and “Why Congress Should Ignore Radical Feminist Opposition to Marriage”.

The whole anti-sexualisation campaign plays to a crowd which is prudishly suspicious of the adult creative industries. Feminist pornographer Anna Span points out that not only can access to porn have a positive impact on people and society, but that blocking commercial porn sites won’t stop teenagers from viewing it anyway, as (not having credit cards) they tend to access porn through filesharing rather than paying for it. Creating an adult pornsite blacklist will only penalise the legitimate producers, she argues:

If the government wants to stop children from accessing porn, all it needs to do is to listen to the world’s adult industries (who are united with everyone else in wanting to prevent underage access). We say they need to take down the (handful of) porn torrent sites, which give teenagers free, easy access to hardcore scenes – scenes whose copyright has been stolen from the producers.

As I wrote last year, it’s not only adult paysites that stand to be caught by the filter, but crowd-sourced sites such as Tumblr, hosted blog sites, LGBT and sexual education resources. The problem is the lack of democratic process and transparency in the creation of these blacklists, which rest entirely in the hands of the private sector.

Tech journalist Violet Blue sums up the problems with the proposals as follows:

I refuse to overlook the fact that each ISP has not revealed what is on these blacklists, while at the same time they have all made it clear that their filtering blacklists contain websites beyond the scope of adult pornography. Nor have they defined pornography. [...]

With the UK conservative government electing to put the onus on the private sector and avoid a public legislative smackdown – and a particularly charged on over the evils of pornography – this has produced a situation where there is a frightening lack of technical and peer scrutiny of the mechanisms being employed.

Cory Doctorow points out that many “adult content” filters include gambling and dating sites; crowd-sourced content sites like Livejournal are included in some filters and not others; and finally that the internet is simply too damn big and constantly evolving for any filter to be kept accurate and up-to-date. A US 2003 investigation found 78-85% of sites included on adult content filters for schools and libraries were miscategorised, with tens of thousands of child-safe educational resources blocked by mistake. He writes that parents who choose not to opt their families out of the default filter

… are in for a nasty shock: first, when their kids (inevitably) discover the vast quantities of actual, no-fooling pornography that the filter misses; and second, when they themselves discover that their internet is now substantially broken, with equally vast swathes of legitimate material blocked.

Quite aside from the dodgy religious agenda and bad research behind these proposals and the technical problems with their implementation, they pose a massive threat to the sexual education the internet has facilitated over the last two decades. How many of us first came to an understanding and acceptance of our kink online? Members of the pre-internet generation often tell me that they envy those of us who grew up with access to the internet, who were able to inform, educate and reassure ourselves about our sexualities before getting trapped in vanilla marriages or spending years thinking our tastes meant we were sinful, freakish or mad.

Any top-down attempt to control public access to information is regressive; and no censorship of this kind has ever survived in the long term. We need to fight against the mindset that thinks this is a fair price to pay to prevent children from encountering sex too soon, and which thinks that blanket governmental controls can replace attentive parenting and common sense.

BDSM in the UK: spanking, the media and the law

Here is the text and video recording of my talk at German fetish advocacy conference BDSMtag. Many thanks to Ludwig for asking the interview questions and providing many interesting conversations about BDSM, society and politics over the course of the weekend.

The first minute and a half of the video is Ludwig’s introduction to the German speaking audience, but the rest of the video is in English.

For those who prefer a written version, here are my notes in full. (This is the text I produced while preparing the talk, not a transcript of the video, so there are some discrepancies between the two.)

Read more »

Weekend hyperkinks #4

I’m coming to the end of a deliciously decadent weekend with D and two very good friends. I had a lovely time at Torture Garden last night, which seemed to have a more relaxed and friendly atmosphere than at previous events, as well as no shortage of pretty people to look at. We got looked at ourselves at various points during the evening, and the debauchery continued once we were back at D’s. I’m curled up on his sofa now under a duvet, happy and sleepy.

Things have been exciting for me since my last hyperkinks – two thrilling shoots for my site (the last ones before I launch!), my growing confidence as a switch with the aid of the ever-willing Jacq, and various good times in my personal life. But there’s been exciting stuff happening in the wider internetty world as well:

Kink

  • I liked this post on the “Seven matrices of submission” by Rabbit White – an interesting deconstruction of varying types or aspects of submission, including ownership, service, restraint, being degraded, being fucked, being given away. Unsurprisingly, I particularly enjoyed the section on being beaten:

    Do you want or need to be beaten? This is not always about pain. You can “beat” someone for long periods of time without hurting them. When you are beaten you are the center of someone’s physical attention. This is about having someone use their strength against you… its not the pain but being the focus of a partner’s aggression. And of course, some people do like pain.

  • BDSM’s Dirty Secret – The Real Risk of Kinky Sex emphasises the emotional intimacy of pain and power play:

    SM, along with some sports, is one of the few remaining semi-sanctioned arenas where raw emotions and connections are permitted and even celebrated. To engage in this behavior may lead to a flood of emotions, elation and even risk a failure to achieve connection, with the added danger of feeling genuine loneliness. It takes guts, skill and personal risk to fly high with another person.

  • The Guardian had an interesting article a couple of weeks back on whether BDSM lifestyle should be protected in UK law as a philosophical belief, hinging on a worker dismissed for wearing her collar to work, and comparing the BDSM lifestyle with other cultural and religious practices. Kitty Stryker offers a counterpoint in her post “public kink != LGBT rights” on the question of whether individuals have the “right” to express their kink in public spaces.
  • BDSM & Rape – what now? – a great round-up by Charlie Glickman, looking at how to reduce/prevent sexual assault within the BDSM community.

Sex work

  • If you ever find yourself in an argument on sex work and feminism, this essay might come in handy – an excellent answer to the question is sex work anti-feminist? (TLDR; no.)
  • While I was in Germany, controversy on sex work and motherhood abounded as Furry Girl aggressively challenged Madison Young on her use of images featuring her newborn. I briefly engaged with the debate on twitter as it first unfolded, but it’s been covered in far more detail since. Brief roundup: Maggie Mayhem explains eloquently why “paedophile” is not an accusation to be made lightly; Furry Girl‘s statement defending her stance; media write-up by Salon magazine and finally, Madison’s artist statement for the work in question.
  • Broadly, I’m with Madison on this one – I don’t think being a sex worker makes every creative expression in your whole life sexual or pornographic by default; I think parents and guardians have the right to consent to childrens’ appearance in art, even political art; I don’t think there’s anything intrinsically wrong with having sex or sexual conversations near, around or in the same room as very young children (although Madison’s ‘crime’ was merely including her child in an educational event about sexuality), and I think it’s highly offensive to suggest that this is in any way comparable to paedophilia. All of this has inevitably triggered thoughts and conversations on sex, sex work and parenting, and some of those thoughts are expressed in my comment on Kitty Stryker’s “To breed or not to breed” post here.

Science!

Female gaze

  • I loved this retro-style pinup set of men wearing and doing stereotypically masculine things – but posing in the style of classic cheesecake. It’s like a cross between cheesecake and beefcake. Mmm, cake.
  • Blue by clickandclash, on Flickr

  • Another interesting female gaze link for you: a website devoted to selling fancy bedroom wear for men to wear to please their lady friends, full of photos of ultra-buff masculine models flaunting lacy and silky underthings. It’s cross-dressing, but it’s not feminising; a fascinating double ground to try and inhabit. I particularly enjoyed the “Fantasy” section, although I admit I was disappointed that the “Iron Man corset” didn’t feature look like actual Iron Man armour.

    But – sculpted latex superhero corsetry for men, though! If it existed, that would actually be awesome.

Whatever you do, don’t click here.

BDSMtag

The main reason I was in Germany was to speak at BDSMtag, the first ever public conference hosted by the BVSM, a national German lobby group on behalf of fetishists and sadomasochists. Dirk Sands, the ringmaster of SM Circus, was also instrumental in bringing the conference about, and he invited me to speak. The pet play shoot was almost an afterthought, since I was visiting anyway.

On the train to Cologne I was working on my talk on my netbook, despite the fact that I was pretty sure the chap sitting next to me spoke English. He glanced over occasionally, but didn’t seem to be paying too much attention. As we approached our destination, however, he kept trying to engage me in conversation. Eventually he came straight out and asked what a native English speaker was doing travelling from Paris to Cologne. I told him I was here for work, and he asked what sort of work I did. I laughed.

“Do you want the honest answer?”

He said yes (of course – people always do, but I feel it’s polite to give them some warning) and I replied that I was a BDSM performer and activist, and I was here to speak at a conference.

“BDSM?” he asked, not understanding. I knew that “kink” wasn’t a European word and “fetisch” didn’t occur to me, so after racking my brains, and convinced that the whole carriage was listening in, I borrowed MayMay‘s phrasing, and told him I was a sexual freedom campaigner. It felt a bit overstated, but he got it – and didn’t seem embarrassed at all. He did seem surprised that I got paid for this, and I had to explain that the conference bit was unpaid, but that I was also doing a paid performance. Luckily we pulled into the station just then, saving me from having to go into further detail.

Poster: Where does perversion start?
BVSM poster: text reads, “Where does perversion start? … We don’t care.”

The BVSM have been active for some years and have over 350 members, but this was their first conference which was open to the wider public. The transition was not a straightforward one. Many members had reservations about public visibility, and were concerned about being outed. Dirk Sands and others, however, felt that outreach was essential. Alongside their political campaigning, the BVSM aims to be the organisation which journalists consult on stories related to kink and fetish, and for this they need to be widely known. There is also a strong interest in educating the public and dispelling myths about BDSM – all of which requires publicity and accessibility.

The conference covered topics ranging from ICD-10, the classification of diseases which lists sadism and masochism as mental disorders, to SM and Christianity, and the relationship between the BDSM community and the wider public. I was asked to speak on the political situation regarding BDSM in the UK, and Director Sands suggested that perhaps the format could be question and answer, with Ludwig conducting the interview. It was a nice laid-back way to do it, and relieved the pressure on me considerably – the opportunity for dialogue made the whole thing more relaxed, and being prompted by questions saved me from having to use notecards.

It was a little odd giving the only English presentation of the day, and I’m not sure how well people were able to follow. But we decided against attempting simultaneous translation – instead a subtitled video will be released online in due course. I’ll make the English text of my talk available online when it’s up, along with a link to the video.

Perhaps unsurprisingly for a new conference, the audience was not huge. I think there were 60 attendees in total, including the BVSM members – a fraction of their total membership – but also including some non-members, and a couple of journalists.

I found the language barrier a bit tricky, particularly after Ludwig and Kaelah left (the other SM Circus folk have more English than I have German, but not enough for easy conversation). While I’m sure there were other people I could have talked to, I struggled with uncharacteristic shyness – feeling as if it was horribly arrogant to expect people to speak my language – and so only brought myself to ask a couple of times. On Sunday morning things got easier as a couple of lovely people with good English approached me and struck up conversations, and I ended up having brilliant long chats with a political, bisexual, polyamorous lady switch, with whom I discovered fair amounts in common.

I also had less trouble with my fellow pet girl Jane: we both spoke cat better than the other’s language, and spent most of the weekend communicating in miaows.

I didn’t mind not being able to be wildly sociable – it gave me an excuse to revel in the privacy of my hotel room, having long showers and lazing around with a book, which was a rare treat. The only time I found myself really craving company was on Saturday night, after buying a couple of new implements from one of the stalls. I picked up a soft leather flogger with broad thongs and a clear perspex handle, just because I don’t own my own flogger yet and it was pretty, and an interestingly shaped, thick leather strap shaped like a spearhead, because I suspected it might feel rather nice. I wouldn’t have minded finding someone to help me try them out on Saturday, but the general ambience wasn’t geared towards play and, sadly, Anglophone tops weren’t listed on room service. I’ve brought them home instead, and between Tom, D and shooting I’m sure they’ll see some use sooner or later.

New implements: a soft leather flogger with broad thongs and a pretty perspex handle, and an interestingly shaped, thick leather strap shaped like a spearhead

Thanks for reading – now be careful; don’t click here.

Weekend hyperkinks #3

Every time I think back on Thursday night I can’t help grinning. I feel like I did after my first well-paid glamour shoot; like a successful shoplifter. There’s a tremendous sense of self-sufficiency, and the giggling, incredulous thrill of having done something outrageous and got away with it. (Although I haven’t quite got away scot-free – aside from the hangover and a bruise on Jacq’s right cheek, my quads have been bloody painful the last two days, and I have no idea why. Can you strain them just by kneeling up on the bed for extended periods of time?)

But enough about me. On to this week’s hyperkinks!

  • My name is me: a new website bringing together people from all walks of life to challenge Google+ and Facebook’s restrictive and damaging policy disallowing pseudonyms. Violet Blue’s statement in particular is a must-read.
  • Maggie Mayhem and Kitty Stryker have put together a new website on ways members of the BDSM community can work together to prevent abuse: www.consentculture.com. Here’s an interview with them about the project, and here’s Kitty’s call for people to contribute their stories.
  • Jane of Janes Guide has written two great articles recently on this topic: BDSM, negotiation and consent, and More on BDSM and abuse. Raw, personal and thought-provoking – worth a read.
  • Lab Coats and Lingerie has a hard-hitting take on the problems with our restrictive model of what it means to be a female top in One of the nineteen. “I had no image of dominance other than the PVC-encased dominatrix, which–while fun to look at–sure isn’t anything like me. Not matching the classic femdom image didn’t just make me not a dominant … I actually believed I was not kinky.”
  • Now for some eye candy! I love this Victorian schoolgirl birching photo.
  • Elegance Studios have a trailer up for their forthcoming bondage feature film, Slave Auction
  • There’s a tremendously engaging sense of fun in this bedroom bondage photo – looking at it I feel like I’m right there with them.
  • Maggie Mayhem and her partner Ned have teamed up to launch an exciting new homegrown porn site, Meet the Mayhems. It combines sex education, informative articles, hot photos and steamy, satirical sex scenes between two people who are really into each other. At $8/month with no strict update schedule and pay-per-download options, it also represents an interesting new take on the traditional paysite model.
  • Next weekend I’m giving a talk at BDSMtag, a kink advocacy and outreach conference in Cologne. One of the organisers is Direktor Sands of SM Circus fame, and he suggested I travel over for the weekend, shoot on the Friday and attend the conference on the Saturday. They proposed an interview format for the talk, which is on BDSM and politics in the UK, so Ludwig has volunteered to help out by asking the questions. Should be fun!
  • Is Spanked, Not Silenced one of your favourite blogs? If so, please visit Between My Sheets and nominate my blog for the 2011 Sexiest Bloggers awards. There’s some great political and sex positive blogs already on the list, and a few kinky blogs, but there aren’t many candidates yet that are both political and kinky. I’d really appreciate the chance to give the topics I write about a wider reach. It’d make me very happy if one of you took the time to make a nomination :)
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...
 
SpankSwap - spanking site banner exchange
Powered by WordPress